On 6/3/2010 2:38 AM Sanity spake thus:

"harry" wrote in message
...

On Jun 3, 2:04�am, "HeyBub" wrote:

harry wrote:

On Jun 1, 1:10?pm, "HeyBub" wrote:

harry wrote:

Remember the King David Hotel? ?No. Ignorant Yanks don't know their
history once again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing

Also known as "Headquarters, British Mandatory Powers - Palestine"

So?

So it was a legitimate military target. That the British chose to hide
behind the skirts of civilians staying in the hotel accures to their
discredit, not the Irgun.

So was the World Trade Center by those stsndards.

I used to think you were stupid. Now you have proven it.

How do you figure? The guy (Harry) is correct: by that reckoning, the
WTC was a legitimate military target. Which is to say, of course, that
neither the WTC nor the King David Hotel were legitimate military targets.


--
The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)