Jay Hanig wrote in
:

On 5/13/2010 3:54 AM, harry wrote:

Rather sad on the news tonight was the school children in China
being killed. �They have strong gun laws so the murderers are
using knives, hammers, and cleavers instead.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yep very sad. If they'd had guns instead of knives they could have
killed SO many more. Maybe even got all the little perishers. Maybe
a few of the police. Maybe even escaped.



The other side of the coin is that had one visitor, teacher, or
administrator been armed, maybe a lot fewer of them would have been
killed.

that's happened at Pearl,MS High School,Appalachian Law School,VA,and a
church in Boulder CO. All three incidents were where an armed citizen
stopped a mass murderer.

But you don't hear much about THOSE incidents from the liberal media.

"To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and
law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own
conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the
law will permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the
lawless will allow... For society does not control crime, ever, by
forcing the law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected
behavior of criminals. Society controls crime by forcing the criminals
to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of the law-abiding."
---------- Jeff Snyder


--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
localnet
dot com