flipper wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:13:12 +0100, richard
wrote:


flipper wrote:

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:47:40 +0100, richard
wrote:


- facilitating the 100:1 ratio of deaths in the assault on Gaza


In combat the object is to kill the active enemy, not to exchange
deaths of your own one to one for the other, and the ideal combat
ratio would be "all:0." 100:1, while good, is short of the ideal.



- and ask yourself if perhaps you are not complicit to
murder ?


No more than Roosevelt was 'complicit to murder' Nazis during WWII.


You argue with words


Of course I argue with words. What are you using? chewing gum?


and think yourself so clever but your thoughts are fossilised


If "clever" it comes from bothering to acquire more than a passing
acquaintance with the facts and that's what irritates you. Reality
doesn't conform to the sloganeering propaganda you've been fed.


and you lack any shred of humanity.


Just what makes supporting the creation of a Palestinian State, like
the U.S. has for 60 years, 'inhumane'? And while I'm at it, what makes
you think that mindlessly bashing the U.S., Israel, and inflaming a 90
year long conflict into an even longer one makes you 'humane'?

Speaking of words, "humanity" encompasses all races and not just one
who's 'leadership' has sworn to destroy another.

If the Palestinians would work on actually creating a State, instead
of incessant militant attacks on Israel that inevitably require a
military response, they'd HAVE one and the main reason they don't is
they're used as political pawns by extremist elements to, as has been
the goal from the beginning, wipe the place clean of 'Jews'.





It's a waste of time talking to you as you are blind to the injustice being perpetuated upon the Palestinian people by the
Israeli state and their sponsors or stupid or most probably a nasty piece of work happy that this injustice should go ahead.