wrote in message
...
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 17:06:10 -0700, "Steve B"
wrote:


"Kurt Ullman" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"JimT" wrote:


With all due respect, that is a different scenario. The first suspect
would
be the restaurant and you'd have a hard time proving it was the mfg. In
the
OP there is no doubt what caused the problem; in the OP's mind at
least.

And in real life, they most likely would go after the restaurant AND
the maker.

--
I get off on '57 Chevys
I get off on screamin' guitars
--Eric Clapton

No, in real life, they go for the "deepest pockets". That being the
client
with the most money.

Steve


No, in real life your lawyer will want to name as many potential
defendants as possible. It makes it less likely that the whole case
will be summarily thrown out, and gives more options for collecting
damages. S.O.P.

Exactly