dennis@home wrote:

"A.Lee" wrote in message ..

No one is denying he is/was a criminal.
It was not 'an unlicensable weapon'.
Tony Martin did not have the relevant certificate, so could not keep a
gun.
The relevant gun could be held by anyone else with either a shotgun
cert. or firearms cert. depending on what model the shotgun is.

So lets get the right.. you don't know what model of shotgun he had but you
state it was licensable.

Are you really stupid, or just putting on a show?
Yes, any shotgun is licensable[1].
Certain shotguns need a Class 1 Firearms certificate, the vast majority
need a Shotgun Certificate.
Is that clear enough?

Alan.

[1] So long as it meets certain rules, such as having a length of over
24" etc.
--
To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'.