"Existential Angst" wrote in message
...
"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
...

"Smitty Two" wrote in message
news
In article ,
"Existential Angst" wrote:

Next, when you grok the difference between a "conventional cut" and a
"climb
cut", post back -- maybe then we can have an intelligent conversation.

Something you clearly don't, EA. Those terms apply to end mills when
using the side of the cutter. Applied to a circular saw blade, they're
just meaningless technobabble used to weakly obfuscate your ignorance.

Uh, I am *not* going to get into this argument, but climb cutting and
conventional cutting apply to many types of cutting tools, including saw
blades. In fact, in production woodworking, there are ripping saws that
operate in the climb mode for the express purpose of avoiding tear-out.
They require fancy hold-downs and feed mechanisms for the workpieces, so
they don't go flying out of the saw. I've seen them, and I've written
about them, and I've had discussions with the blade makers about the
differences in the two types of blades.

Well, you are talking geometry to two assholes with cataracts bigger than
a golf ball.

Note, however, that RAS's climb cut de rigeur.... even tho, as I stated
previously, climb cutting on thick material in a RAS is a pita.
--
EA

I avoided bringing up radial arm saws because...well, because some people
laugh at radial arm saws for "real" woodworking. g

Not me! I do not want to get flamed by the RAS lovers of the world.

--
Ed Huntress