On Dec 4, 8:27*pm, "John R. Carroll" wrote:
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
On Dec 4, 4:44 pm, "John R. Carroll" wrote:
pyotr filipivich wrote:
Let the Record show that " on or
about Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:40:58 -0800 (PST) did write/type or cause
to appear in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:
On Dec 4, 6:51 pm, Too_Many_Tools wrote:

I am passing on a question that I was just asked about this post.

If Emerson will not hire any Americans (" I am not going to hire
anybody in the United States."), why should any American consumer
or business buy a product that contains Emerson content?

TMT

Easy. Emerson products will be made by people that work and should
be rewarded for working. You seem to have a very provincial mind.

Dan

I have a question for the TMT types. If Emerson moves production
outside the US, because the US Government seems to be opposed to
people who actually hire people and produce things,

LOL
They are moving to their markets. A global economy is served
locally. It couldn't be otherwise.
"the US Government" has nothing to do with that fact of life.

with what will
they buy products which have Emerson content? Government IOUs? Food
ration cards?

Why do you support the creation or promotion of "government" that
would have you embrace a five dollar per day standard of living?
Just head off to China, or Viet Nam. You are unemployed anyway. Go
and do somethin'!
Take Gummer with you. He's ripped of his fellows beyond his time.
The both of you need skills you don't have to be worth anything as
employees.

pyotr filipivich
We will drink no whiskey before its nine.
It's eight fifty eight. Close enough!

Obviously true in your case.

--
John R. Carroll- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Likely he wants it because his economic situation is five dollars a
day.

But one must wonder why he and Gunner don't move to China?

But then again they would have to actually work wouldn't they?

I think Pyotr would be willing and able to put in an honest days work.
He's described his job here a couple of times and it isn't gravy.
That description, however, is the problem. I could replcae him with a robot
and an optical scanning inspection station.
It would be more reliable than any human and be without the costs related to
employment.

He needs to train out of a discipline that supports this as a smart business
descision.
His competition isn't some Chinaman, it's GE Fanuc Robotics.

--
John R. Carroll- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And the Chinese programmers that GE has doing the programming.

TMT