On Dec 4, 4:44*pm, "John R. Carroll" wrote:
pyotr filipivich wrote:
Let the Record show that " on or
about Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:40:58 -0800 (PST) did write/type or cause to
appear in rec.crafts.metalworking *the following:
On Dec 4, 6:51 pm, Too_Many_Tools wrote:

I am passing on a question that I was just asked about this post.

If Emerson will not hire any Americans (" I am not going to hire
anybody in the United States."), why should any American consumer or
business buy a product that contains Emerson content?

TMT

Easy. *Emerson products will be made by people that work and should
be rewarded for working. *You seem to have a very provincial mind.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dan

I have a question for the TMT types. *If Emerson moves production
outside the US, because the US Government seems to be opposed to
people who actually hire people and produce things,

LOL
They are moving to their markets. A global economy is served locally. It
couldn't be otherwise.
"the US Government" has nothing to do with that fact of life.

with what will
they buy products which have Emerson content? Government IOUs? Food
ration cards?

Why do you support the creation or promotion of "government" that would have
you embrace a five dollar per day standard of living?
Just head off to China, or Viet Nam. You are unemployed anyway. Go and do
somethin'!
Take Gummer with you. He's ripped of his fellows beyond his time.
The both of you need skills you don't have to be worth anything as
employees.

pyotr filipivich
We will drink no whiskey before its nine.
It's eight fifty eight. Close enough!

Obviously true in your case.

--
John R. Carroll- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Likely he wants it because his economic situation is five dollars a
day.

But one must wonder why he and Gunner don't move to China?

But then again they would have to actually work wouldn't they?

And all their BS Usenet postings would come to a screeching halt.

TMT