DIYbanter - View Single Post

aarcuda69062

In article ,
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:12:13 -0700, Winston_Smith
wrote:

(Edward A. Falk) wrote:
Deucalion wrote:

That's three questions.

And therein lies the problem. No matter how thoroughly Obama proves
his citizenship -- birth cert., newspaper clippings, vouched for by
the governor of Hawaii -- there's always more demands from the
birthers. Now they want to see *another* birth cert.

We haven't see the first one yet. We did see a modern document
attesting that there was something in the state files. But the rules
at the time allowed for several kinds of births to be recorded in a
way that make them all appear the same today. They ARE essentially
the same for ordinary citizens. They are not the same for the purpose
of determining the citizenship of the guy that was elected president.

Now they want to see his passport.

That's real nice and simple spin. But read the post. ANY passport he
may have used EITHER was illegal OR proves he is not a citizen. If
the original birth certificate is to be withheld, then we must look
for something else to prove citizenship. Or not. Again, we have
nothing from Obama and a lot of flash and spin from his droids.

If he were to produce those, they'd want to
see something else.

I'll settle for the original Hawaii birth certificate. If it's there
and legitimate, I will end my search for some sort of answer.'

Put up or stop apologizing.

From a USA Today issue quoting the Honolulu Advertiser:

By Dan Nakaso, The Honolulu Advertiser
In an attempt to quash persistent rumors that President Obama was not
born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961, Hawaii's health director reiterated
Monday afternoon that she has personally seen Obama's birth
certificate in the Health Department's archives:

"I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of
Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the
Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was
born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing
further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in
October 2008 over eight months ago...."

Here is the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health testifying
that the man was born in Hawaii. The alternate is to assume that the
Hawaii State Government is somehow been suborned.

Here is the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health giving a legal
opinion contrary to what is written in Section 1 of article 2 of the
constitution.

Suborned? Not necessarily, just woefully ignorant.

700 million dollars can buy a lot of ignorance.