Giftzwerg wrote:
In article , says...


And, what di Mr' Lay do that was illegal?


Oh, right, I'd almost forgotten about this mentality. Just because the
Reagan administration was engaged in highly illegal activities selling
arms for Contras doesn't mean that the Commander Chief knew anything
about something that was going on right under his nose. Naturally,
nobody in their right mind believes this, but we nail the patsy anyway.


Speaking of "mentality," isn't it absolutely *fascinating* how the left
decided, oh, around the 21st of January, 2001, that it's previous
requirement for an actual conviction to tar someone with an illegal act
was outdated?

Thank God the accusation is enough when we're talking Republicans, eh,
Fatboy?


****head, your point must be buried somewhere beneath the mountain of
feces you call a thought process. Republicans were busy spearheading
investigations about whether or not Clinton got his dolphin waxed.
Could they have been any more desperate? No, of course they couldn't.
Meanwhile, there have been so many illegal activities tallied by Lay,
Cheney, and Bush, it would take a federal prosecutor months just to
tabulate them all. Your double standard is a mile wide.