Plunge v Fixed Base Router
I have a combo set and it is nice to have the plunge base when I need but 9
times out of 10 I use the fixed base.
"Bob G" wrote in message
t...
"Brian" wrote in message
...
I suppose it can, but to me a plunge router is not ideal often. It is
not
ideal in a table application. It is larger and more cumbersome (given
the
same size motor) for edge work on smaller pieces. In fact, I really
only
use a plunge base in cases where I'm truely benefitting by the plunge
action - i.e. when I need to route material "inside" a piece without
starting from the edge, such as when mortising since I don't have a
mortiser.
Just my preferences, FWIW.
Brian.
==========================
I share Brians opinions ...
If I had ONLY one router then I would have to own a Plunge...because when
you need that feature you DO NEED IT... but I rarely NEED the ability to
make a Plunge cut...
I have routers that are dedicated for table use (a couple of regular
tables,
an overhead Pin router table and a horizontal table...all these tables
have
routers that never leave them... And I have one router that sits next to
my
plunge router that I use for 90 percent of my hand held operations... The
Plunge router gets very little use..BUT like I said when I need that
feature
I can pull the plunge router off the shelf...
Bob Griffiths
|