View Single Post
  #30   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Bud-- Bud-- is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,981
Default "Backstabbed" wiring: bad rap?

Larry The Snake Guy wrote:
On Aug 14, 2:51 pm, David Nebenzahl wrote:

First of all, it is an approved, UL/CSA tested, and, most importantly,
code-approved (US building code) wiring method. If it was as all-fired
bad as folks here claim, why would it still be allowed? After all, the
building codes tend to err on the side of caution.


However, all kinds of unreliable crap is UL listed. A UL listing is a
pretty good indication that something probably won't kill you or burn
down your house, but says nothing at all about whether it will
function properly.


By coincidence I have the UL standard [15 years old] for "Snap Switches".
For AC-only switches (which is what are commonly used) the switch must
pass all the following at rated voltage:
- 10,000 operations at rated current
- 10,000 operations at rated current and power factor around 0.8
- 10,000 operations at rated current controlling incandescent loads
[high inrush current]
- 100 operations at 4.8x rated current and power factor around 0.5

IMHO this is testing for whether the switch will "function properly".

My recollection is receptacle tests are similarly rigorous and include
plugging and unplugging and operating for a periods at significantly
above rated current.

I think most of us would be very unhappy if fuses or circuit breakers
that are UL listed did not "function properly".

For devices like TVs, it is not possible (or desirable) for UL to
determine if the device is actually useful. The test is whether the
device will "kill you or burn down your house".

Standards may not be perfect. They weren't for #12 backstabs, old
technology #12 and #10 aluminum wire, or devices originally used with
that wire. And standards for GFCIs have changed quite a bit.

IMHO standards are not adequate for #14 backstabs - maybe if they were
limited to #20 wire or smaller....

Building codes put a little more emphasis on
function, but are also updated fairly regularly because things that
were once required are finally proven to be bad ideas.


The NEC has very few equipment construction requirements and I can't
think of any performance requirements.

The 'prime directive' is that "equipment required or permitted by this
Code shall be acceptable only if approved".

"Approved" is "acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction."

The NEC generally has only a few rather general guidelines on what
should be acceptable. "Authorities" generally accept equipment that is
"listed" or "labeled", but it is up to the "authorities".


The NEC did not eliminate #12 backstabs or change requirements for #12
and #10 aluminum wiring.

--
bud--