In message , "dennis@home"
writes


"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message om...
dennis@home wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in

Oh FFS. You decided to try & be clever and not tell anyone what the
speed limit for a cycle was. Then you became anal again & said;

I will give you a clue.. I know of no one that can exceed it on a
cycle.

So its less than 167 mph then?

What you say is illogical.
Nothing I have said says what the limit is and does not specify an
upper limit.
If you think it does then you need to learn English.

I'll type this slowly Dennis, so you might understand it. The speed
record for a cycle is 167 mph. Might we be right in assuming that the
speed limit is less than this?

So, tell us all, oh clever one, what is the speed limit for a cycle?

I will say this very slowly for you as you are thick..

The speed record has nothing to do with speed limits!
This means that your 167 mph figure means nothing.

As you really are thick I will attempt to explain it to you in simple
terms..

The sub thread you decided to reply to was about riding a bike at
center parcs..
this is private land and does not have legal speed limits for cycles
(or even ones for cars set out in law).
therefore there are no speed limits for cycles and I still know of no
one that can exceed them.
(the same applies to the forest area also talked about BTW)



"Careful you don't exceed the speed limit Dennis

I don't know of any person that could exceed the speed limit on a bike"

The way you presented it really doesn't read that way. You specifically
say that you couldn't on a bike, but infer that you could using some
other form of transport


--
geoff