"J. Clarke" wrote in
:
Han wrote:
"Leon" wrote in
:
"Han" wrote in message
...
Swingman wrote in news:AaKdnX4ygp-
:
Exactly. But that is not my question. Why did an innocent guard at
a museum have to die? Why did all those people in the Murrah
building in Oklahoma City have to die? Or is that the risk of
living?
Might want to rethink that question. Do you know of any one that
will not eventually die? I suspect that more people die of natural
causes than from weapons. Being killed has always been and will
always be a risk of living.
I don't understand. I am the fatalist, I believe that when your
number is up, you're gonzo. But does that mean that we have to
condone lunatics who hatch murderous plans?
So what do you propose to do about them?
We are paying the FBI to prevent terrorism, and we have monitors exmining
websites. People who openly advertise that they are crazy (as von Brunn
did on his website) should not be allowed to possess firearms. In
addition, I am afraid that airport-type controls should be instituted at
places like the Holocaust museum(s). The ubiquitous presence of firearms
permits too many crazies to go around killing people. If you don't want
to limit firearms possession, we'll all have to live in an armed
defensive camp.
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid