John Fields wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
John Fields wrote:
"mark krawczuk" wrote:
"John Larkin" wrote

This sounds like one of those automotive Brown's gas things, in which
case the whole thing is a waste of time and silicon.

hi, i dont think anything interesting is a waste of time .
wether people like you dont like it , well tough , you can NEVER TELL
where this sort of experementing will take you , without experimenting ,
we would have nothing.

---
But, Mark, you just don't understand.

If Mr. Larkin says it's a waste of time and silicon, then regardless of
whether anyone wants to experiment and find out _why_ , for themselves,
they really shouldn't.

OK, alternator/battery drives DC-120VAC converter, which drives
transformer-rectifier DC supply, then high-voltage flyback converter,
which drives electrolyzer to make hydrogen+oxygen gas bubbles, which
are injected into the engine intake to make more energy than it took
to drive the alternator. Run your car on water!

And you don't see anything wrong with the thermodynamics of this?

Fields isn't as smart as he makes himself out to be.

---
How would _you_ know?

By observation.

Graham