On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:38:41 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:19:02 -0800, John Larkin
wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:42:06 -0600, John Fields
wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:29:24 +1030, "mark krawczuk"
wrote:




"John Larkin" wrote in message
m...

This sounds like one of those automotive Brown's gas things, in which
case the whole thing is a waste of time and silicon.

hi, i dont think anything interesting is a waste of time .
wether people like you dont like it , well tough , you can NEVER TELL
where this sort of experementing will take you , without experimenting ,
we would have nothing.

---
But, Mark, you just don't understand.

If Mr. Larkin says it's a waste of time and silicon, then regardless of
whether anyone wants to experiment and find out _why_ , for themselves,
they really shouldn't.

OK, alternator/battery drives DC-120VAC converter, which drives
transformer-rectifier DC supply, then high-voltage flyback converter,
which drives electrolyzer to make hydrogen+oxygen gas bubbles, which
are injected into the engine intake to make more energy than it took
to drive the alternator. Run your car on water!

And you don't see anything wrong with the thermodynamics of this?

John


I had a school teacher tell me that, when confronted by confusing
science, she fell back to "common sense". Need I say more ?:-)

Doctors and dentists make particularly gullible investors ;-)

...Jim Thompson

Some things are truly impossible. The universe just forbids them from
working. An engineer should be able to spot them and save time and
money.

Imagine what a mess it would be if anything were possible!

John