In article ,
wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:14:52 -0800, Bruce L. Bergman
wrote:


Popular Mechanics did a total debunk of this. It's a non issue.

Popular Mechanics is a known propaganda mouthpiece for the
military/industrial complex. Anything in that mag is suspect.

1. Fire. 2. Physical damage from huge chunks of flying stuff.

The latest NIST report admits that no "hollowing out" of the building
ocurred due to "chunks of flying stuff". Look at the vids. The
structure was basically intact, leaving only fire damage as the
supposed cause.

Correct, NIST didn't say

"hollowing out" of the building
ocurred due to "chunks of flying stuff". Look at the vids. The
structure was basically intact, leaving only fire damage as the
supposed cause.

They did say structural failure due to protracted fire was the cause.









--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail