PDQ wrote:
"Robatoy" wrote in message
...
The pleated-paper canister filter on my 2HP DC is just overwhelmed.
Better than the old bag. A bag is good for 1 hour.... I really need
to do something.
I figure that if I were to upgrade to a double canister 3-4 HP
set-up, all it would do would buy a little time between dumping.

So, I'm told that a cyclone is the way to go. What do we know about
those things?

r

1. Does not matter what version of dust collection you implement.
The only way to lengthen the time between dumpings is to either stop
collecting or get a bigger container.

The difference is that with a cyclone you just empty a container, you
don't have to beat dust off of the clogged filters, which if I
understand correctly was the issue.

With a properly designed cyclone very, very little gets to the
filters.


2. Lee Valley
http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.a...t=1,42401&ap=1
has a really good write-up on the theory of a cyclone collector.
Their catalogue has a lot of accessories to really make it sing.

3. As theory goes, the cyclone approach really works. In practice,
it is only as good as the collection system you hook up to it.

I see very little in the way of fines settling out regardless of
whether the machine I'm using is connected to the cyclone.

--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)