On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:22:22 -0000, PeterD wrote:

On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:42:16 -0000, "Peter Hucker"
wrote:

On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:53:51 -0000, PeterD wrote:

On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:25:43 GMT, "Peter"
wrote:

Thankyou for being one of the few who took this question seriously.
By "Ladar" I am refering to Laser speed detection. (And no I did not make
the term up)
As for "Radar", I have a GPS with fixed position speed cameras defined, so
I'm fine there.

There is no defense against laser speed detectors.

What's wrong with the GPS way? It covers all the known hideout spots. It doesn't matter what methos the cops are using.


You are kidding, right? "All the known hideout spots..." All of them?
Around here, that would be virtually the entire state, or at least
that part of the state where are are roads, at least. Get real, speed
traps are setup wherever the cop wants it to be.

Then your cops are cleverer than ours. In the UK, cops have zero qualifications. They sit in the easy spots, same ones every time. And you can guarantee they will only be there in nice weather.

--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

We were home alone the other night. The kids were out, and it was nice and quiet.
We were resting on the couch, my head in my wife's lap, when she took off my glasses.
"You know," she said sweetly, "without your glasses you look like the same handsome young man I married."
"You know," I said, "without my glasses, you still look pretty good too!"