On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:38:38 -0500, flipper wrote:

On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:20:59 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


"flipper" wrote in message
m

They've been working on it for a lot longer than that and with a
broader scope as well. Like destroying most practical means of domestic
energy production.

I especially love how they do that for 30 years, and now deride the
proposed solutions because they will allegedly take 10 years to have an
effect.

It's more absurd than that. While they rail about "10 years" the one and
only freaking 'plan' they propose, useless as it is, is, guess what, "10
years."


(I know, the effect will start immediately because of the Arab's reaction
to our drilling. Just another example of the Dem's belief in a static
market.)

The fact is if offshore drilling were allowed there are many places where
increased production could show in 2 or 3 years.

Btw, don't be too encouraged by the ban having 'expired'. For one,
Congress would still have to sell the leases and one of the first things
on the Democrat agenda, if the election goes as they expect, is to
reinstate the ban.

By her own words Pelosi's goal is to "save the planet" so as long as the
Democrats are in control you can forget about any meaningful domestic
energy production and the only thing that'll keep gasoline prices from
doubling or tripling will be Obama's business taxes keeping us in a
recession.

Wont need gas. Obama will have Acorn pick you up and take you to the
bread line. When King Obama and Prime Minister Pelosi get done you will
go to your State job on the State run bus. Alaska will be for your
State mandated 5 day vacation, flown there on Obamaflot. When you get
back the King's men - oops - bureaucrats will tell you to jump and you
damn well better say "how high" or they will take away your State cheese.

--
Joe Chisolm
Marble Falls, TX