On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:03:48 -0700, UCLAN wrote:

mm wrote:

Read my sig.

... if you had one.

The post you replied to had one.

No, it didn't.

Why do you say that?

When that post came back to me, it had a sig, almost the identical sig
that my next post had and that this post will have.

Now I can understand that a reader can't tell just from looking what I
wrote specifically for a given post, and what came from the sig. file.

But I can't understand how the two of you don't know that you can't
tell just from looking, and why you think there was no sig. when I've
told you there was one**. And why it's so important to each of you,
and why you're so sure you're right, that you go to the trouble to
post.

**When I said "See my sig" in my first post, and again when I assured
Allodox in my second post that there was a sig.

That really interests me, and I would be most interested in any
explanation. And grateful for a serious explanation.

(You're not just pulling my chain because I don't always use a period
after "sig", are you? That would be quite a waste of time and
bandwidth, so I don't think it's that.)
--
A tribute to Erols/RCN/Starpower which took away newsgroups,
without giving any notice, in advance or when they did it!!

And a real tribute to https://www.forteinc.com/apn/subscribe.php
which starts at 3 dollars for 12 gigs a month,
including alt, misc, the big 8 and everything else, 12 gigs is
far more than someone who dl's mostly text should ever need.