On 2008-08-02 23:06:38 +0100, Andy Burns
said:

On 02/08/2008 22:47, Andy Hall wrote:

Only because a dog was involved.

If it had been a toddler? If the dog had pulled its owner over? All
sounds a bit too close for comfort to me.

So what is the solution?

- More ambulances so that they can statistically be closer to locations
where there is an emergency?

- Separate lanes everywhere?

- Operate always within the speed limit?

- Allow patients to die?


Do any of these guarantee that the dog or a toddler wouldn't have been hit?