Dave wrote in message ...
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:36:54 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


Dave wrote in message news
Fourty plus feet IS just a few feet.

Not if you're standing on the beach and you're six feet tall. d8-)

Ya got fourty days to walk up hill or inland. Geezze how dumb were
these six foot people.


These morons would need well over a mile of water to do the trick they
propose happened.

If you want to start quoting NASA then do the calculations on the heat
released to condense that much water vapor into the big bad old rain
for the fabled fourty days.

No condensation necessary for the NASA figures. It's already condensed.

Yes is is needed for the other thousands and thousands of feet of
water. Just to cover the rockies you would need twenty thousand feet
of the wet stuff. Now there is those other pesky mountains about the
planet that would need to get wet.

I wasn't talking about Noah. I was just correcting your suggestion that
there isn't enough water on the planet to raise sea levels by "more than a
few feet."




The planet would be a burnt crisp long before it got partly done.

If you're talking about Noah, yes, certainly.


I dont know if you are allowed to read the other nasty thoughts but
have a look at http://members.aol.com/darrwin/flood.htm


Calculations done my friend !!

Not the right ones to support your claim about how much water there is on
the planet, and how much sea levels would rise if it was all liquid.

BTW, that was just one ice shelf and one part of Antarctica. If you want
to
add it all up, it's a lot more.


No actually it is not that much more. If you melted every lick of the
frozen stuff everywhere on the planet it would still be under a
hundred feet. The planet has a fair bit of surface area.

That's a lot of feet.



BTW the world aint flat either.

How about that.

Yes it's true beleive it or not.