"John R. Carroll" wrote in message
...
Ed Huntress wrote:
"John R. Carroll" wrote in
message ...
Ed Huntress wrote:
"Mark Rand" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 May 2008 20:42:30 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:

snip long list of reasons to vote for Obama


It's time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of
firsts, let's first make sure we elect the person who is qualified
to be our president in a nuclear age during a global
civilizational war.





I hadn't realised you were one of his supporters. He certainly
seems to be the
only one of the three that won't end up destroying your country.

Isn't it nice to be given a real choice of direction?

Before you get too certain about it, check today's news about what
the Catholic Priest said yesterday at Obama's church. The priest
apparently doesn't like white people in general, and Hillary in
particular. If I were Obama, I'd have him stuffed and mounted
immediately. g

However this looks from over there, Mark, it ain't. There is no way
you could catch the flavor of this from across the pond. You can
follow the BBC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, and
anything else you want, but you won't get the true flavor. It's like
pins and needles.

But it is Obama's to lose. The sputtering antagonism you may see
here is the work of the very conservative dead-enders who tend to
hang out here. They'd might as well be ****ing upwind.

You want a laugh Ed?
Some 527 is running a 30 second Hillary spot here in CALIFORNIA
today.

Jeez. They must have some money they have to get rid of.

I've heard ten million dollars tossed around as the number HRC has put
into
her campaign.
Can 527 money be used for that purpose?

I have no idea. That whole business is something I've never looked into.

Mark Penne must be ****ting the proverbial brick right about now.
The Clinton campaign just rejected a compromise on Florida and Michigan
and
apparently indicated that they were ready to go all the way to the
Credentials Committee at the convention. There wouldn't be any way to
cover
the loans from party coffers if that happens.
I wonder what she thinks she's doing?

I can only guess, but she may be playing brinkmanship over money. I heard a
couple of weeks ago that she was pushing Obama's campaign to cover her
campaign losses, but I haven't heard anything since. He had indicated then
that he would talk about it. Maybe the talks haven't gone her way and she's
turning up the screws.

But that's only a guess.

--
Ed Huntress