"Steve W." wrote in message
...
http://snipurl.com/26uz7 [www_nytimes_com]
http://snipurl.com/26uzf [earthobservatory_nasa_gov]
http://snipurl.com/26uzl [wingod_newsvine_com]
http://www.climateaudit.org/wp-conte...4/tropic53.gif
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006...n_Cooling.html
"I think both Brennan and Shepherd are full of crap, and that neither one
has any idea regarding what they're talking about. They have an agenda of
their own(they're both with righty wacko "news" organizations) and it has
nothing to do with science. They can be safely ignored as bull****
bloviators."
I guess NASA, The New York Times and the Earth Observatory section at NASA
are also "righty wackos"
Did you read the NASA news release, or just the Newsmax rehash of American
Stinker's rehash?
It may be too complicated for those...uh..."journalists." The story is that
the PDO cycle this time is likely to be a long one (their ups and downs have
been tracked for decades, so they have some knowledge of these things), and
the temperatures resulting from the PDO cycle are likely to swing widely
enough to mask the global warming trend. Also, locally, the effects of a La
Niņa can push the evidence either way.
Our "journalists" used this as evidence that something is wrong with the
research climatologists at NASA. Of course, these "journalists" have a deep
knowledge of the science involved. Right....
--
Ed Huntress