View Single Post
  #30   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
w_tom w_tom is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 376
Default Intermatic Whole House Surge Protector ?

On Apr 22, 3:14 pm, wrote:
I know one thing. If a surge does make it to the outlet, I'd rather
have it next encounter the MOVs inside the $20 surge protector,
instead of the ones in the $2000 TV.- Hide quoted text -


Review Page 42 Figure 8. A surge arrives on black (hot) wire. Plug-
in protector shunts that surge onto white (neutral) and green (safety
ground) wires. Now that surge has three paths to find earth ground,
8000 volts destructively, through that TV. Bud's citation that shows
what a plug-in protector might do ALSO shows how that same ineffective
protector can contribute to appliance damage.

w_tom has addressed this apartment problem repeatedly. A kludge.
Cut the protector power cord as short as possible. Plug it into a
receptacle attached to the breaker box. This locates the protector as
far as possible from appliances and close to earth ground. No, this
is not very good protection. But it is an improvement over the worst
installation; a protector adjacent to the appliance.

Meanwhile, apartments in steel and concrete buildings already have
best earthing. Breaker box is bonded to steel. Only needed is a
'whole house' protector - effective earthing already exists.

w_tom learned this stuff decades ago in this example. A house
without a 'whole house' protector had networked computers; two
computers on plug-in protectors. All computers powered off. Plug-in
protectors created the damage as demonstrated three paragraphs up.
Black wire surge was shunted (connected) to the green wire. Plug-in
protector bypassed protection in both computers - put surges into each
computer's motherboard and network card. Surge found earth ground via
the network, a third computer and its modem. Without plug-in
protectors, the surge would not have been shunted (diverted, clamped,
bonded) into motherboard - would not have bypassed protection already
inside those computers. Better protection would have been no plug-in
protector. Or connecting protector to a receptacle at the breaker box
- as far as possible from computers to be closer to earth ground.

Using a plug-in protector without a properly earthed 'whole hosue'
protector can result in adjacent appliance damage - as demonstrated by
Bud in his citation Page 42 Figure 8. Plug-in protector can only
supplement - cannot replace missing earth ground protection. Without
the 'whole house' protector, in so many examples, the plug-in
protector then created electronics damage.

Only wild speculation says a plug-in protector is better than
nothing. A plug-in protector does not even claim to protect from
typically destructive surges. Do not assume, as Bud hopes, that all
surges are same. Had the plug-in protectors not exists, then all
networked computers may not have been damaged.

We earth surge protectors for a type of surge that typically causes
damage AND must be earthed. No way around what must provide
protection even in apartments.

trader, unlike a sales promoter Bud, I have actually done this. We
designed some of this stuff (in custom installations), and learned
from mistakes. One mistake - I foolishly thought a plug-in protector
was better than nothing. Then lightning taught us some lessons. No
way around what provides protection from the typically destructive
surge: earth ground. Even the manufacturer will not claim what Bud
is posting. Above: plug-in protectors too close to the appliance even
made damage possible. What kind of protection is that? Ineffective
protection. In multiple examples, plug-in protector was worse than
nothing. But good news: it will protect from a surge that typically
does not create damage. That means complete protection.