On 2008-04-11 13:43:31 +0100, "dennis@home"
said:



"Andy Hall" wrote in message news:47ff1f23@qaanaaq...
On 2008-04-11 08:46:54 +0100, "The Medway Handyman"


Good enough is good enough to many.

Good enough, is good enough to some. One can always strive to improve.



Being better than good enough shows that the quality control system is broken.
Who wants to buy from a company with a broken quality control system?

Quality control is essentially defining what you are going to do, doing
it and measuring that you are doing it.

There is nothing inherent in quality control that says that you can't
make improvements or for that matter downgrade.

The "good enough" discussion is whether the customer will accept the
product offering as being acceptable for his purposes or not and that
varies by customer. It is the job of product managers to
determine which set of customer requirements they wish to address and
then to agree with engineering and manufacturing on how to achieve that
and whether it's possible at the desired price, cost and margin levels.