"Andy Hall" wrote in message news:47fe4d29@qaanaaq...
On 2008-04-10 08:38:31 +0100, "dennis@home"
said:



"Andy Hall" wrote in message news:47fda878@qaanaaq...

This is why the lifetime cost and profile of use should be considered
and not just the price on the ticket.

As should the cost of chucking it away when a better tool is made for the
job.
I can see that a 40 year old BOSCH saw is going to be as easy to use as a
new one, maybe.
Just because a tool can last 40 years doesn't mean it should, times
change, safety systems change, materials change buying one built to last
may mean throwing a tool away that could last another 20 years if you
didn't want some better features.

This is a valid point and should also be taken into account. However, in
extremis it is not a reason to view tools as disposable items.



Why not? Its the reason I view cars as being disposable.