In article ,
Sam Chambers wrote:
"JackD" wrote in message ...
Did you read the "performance specification" that was submitted? It states
a
number of requirements which are clearly tailored to a specific
implementation - the very same implementation that is patented by those
submitting the petition.

Well of course it is, since their product is the only one on the market that
detects human flesh and stops a spinning blade. I did read the petition,

But did you also read the PATENT CLAIMS ?