Thread: 2008 Pres
View Single Post
  #316   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Kurt Ullman Kurt Ullman is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,016
Default 2008 Pres

In article ,
"HeyBub" wrote:

KLS wrote:

Of course, those people always like the most regressive taxes as they
don't care about the actual impact of the taxes on real people,
looking only at the numbers to make sure they're "fair."


If we want a "fair" tax, regressive taxes are the way to go. Poor people use
more services. It's only fair.


All of the Fair Tax proposals have credits (mostly paid monthly,
sorta like a refund check) given for spending up to the poverty line, or
possibly above, to address these concerns. Now how well they address it
open to discussion, ; demogogary. and all the general ups and down of
political "discourse".



But the mother is responsible, so what to do? She could contribute a kidney.
At a price of $65,000 she could pay the taxes for her entire brood for five
years. After five years, she could donate a cornea. Same deal. After another
five years, her offspring would be entering the breeding market and the
process could start anew.

See the part about demogogary above