Thread: TV
View Single Post
  #39   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
claude claude is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 37
Default TV


"Dan Espen" wrote in message
...
writes:

On Nov 20, 2:52 am, (Dave Martindale) wrote:
"DonC" writes:
You won't need a converter for cable if you just want the analog
channels.
Which won't exist after 2/17/2009. So you may "want the analog
channels"
but there won't be any.

Which analog channels are you referring to? There won't be any
over-the-air analog channels, but there may still be analog channels on
cable. The cable system already receives those broadcasts and
translates them to a different frequency for retransmission on cable.
All they have to do to continue distributing those channels in analog is
receive them with a digital receiver, then feed it to an analog TV
modulator for distribution.

If they don't do this, all their customers using analog tuners (no
digital box) to receive cable will scream.


Yes, that's what will happen. The cable companies aren't going to
alienate their customer base


Uh, you're trying to tell me Comcast will miss an opportunity to
alienate their customer base? I find that hard to believe.

Seriously, at some point, not long after the conversion,
the cable companies will want to rid themselves of the digital
to analogue conversion. It will allow them to deliver more
channels and save costs. Not to mention collect rental on
set top boxes.

Some providers (like Verizon FIOS) are all digital now.
I switched to FIOS last week and the Verizon trucks are all
over town.


A Digital signal is wonderful right? WRONG. Some astute little prick already
took out a patent that will stop you from changing channel
when a commercial comes on. You will be able to watch the shows commercial
free for a fee. I get a queasy stomach just thinking about
some system that tell me I can't do something, I have enough of that with my
wife )

Claude