On Sep 27, 3:40?pm, "RBM" rbm2(remove wrote:
Tell me you don't wear a tin foil hat

"w_tom" wrote in message

ups.com...



On Sep 26, 10:04 pm, "RBM" rbm2(remove wrote:
Virtually everything you wrote is baseless incoherent gibberish,
otherwise
you'd be able to produce some NEC documentation to back it up

An intelligent reply would have cited what you have problems with.
But since you post insults, citing code numbers would not change your
mind. Shame on RBM for not even knowing what can and cannot be
conductors. Code is specific about what can be conductors. Pipes are
no longer permitted. Those who are still living in 1970s would not
know that pipes are not acceptable electrical conductors.

If spending more time reading, then your responses would be devoid
of insults. Profanity identifies one who typically finds reading
difficult - who do not know. It explains why RBM knows pipes are
acceptable as conductors. Profanity does not change the fact. Water
pipes are no longer approved for electrical conductors. RBM should
know that if posting recommendations here. Instead he posts profanity
- will not even state which parts he has problems with. Note to
self. Don't take RBM seriously. His intelligence is defined by his
reasoning - insults rather than facts.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

your better off using 2 ground rods because during wet weather one
might pass the resistance check but not during a dry spell. in
addition all grounds for things like telephone NID and satellite
dishes must be joined together to meet code.