"Clark" wrote in message
...
kjpro @ usenet.com wrote in news:daed2$46d44a5e$9440c41e$8106
@STARBAND.NET:
"Clark" wrote in message
...
kjpro @ usenet.com wrote in news:55549$46d06373$9440c41e$28949
@STARBAND.NET:
"Clark" wrote in message
...
kjpro @ usenet.com wrote in
:
"Clark" wrote in message
...
kjpro @ usenet.com wrote in news:45da6$46cdaeec$9440c41e$9217
@STARBAND.NET:
"Clark" wrote in message
...
kjpro @ usenet.com wrote in
news:125e3$46ccf073$9440c41e$9970
@STARBAND.NET:
"Clark" wrote in message
...
kjpro @ usenet.com wrote in news:bc2b7$46cc3989$9440c41e
$13704
@STARBAND.NET:
"Moe Jones" wrote in message
...
wrote:
I have a home with a basement. We had it built in
1999.
The
HVAC
(gas) sits right next to the gas water heater. This
utility
room
is
around 20' x 8' with a tight door, located in the
basement.
There
are two cold air returns on the 1st floor.
The HVAC metal ducting that goes into the attic for
the
cold
air
returns has two large holes in it with vents, right
beside
the
gas
water heater. If I remove the grills and cover up
these
so
they
can't get air, the duct work at that location gets
sucked
in
slightly
due to the negative air pressure (I think I'm saying
this
right.)
I read in a Popular Mechanics that you don't want cold
air
returns
near the furnace. I know nothing about this stuff.
Are
these
vents
cold air returns? Is this an issue? Should I have
these
vents
closed
off and another cold air return piped to the hallway?
Thank you;
Edwin
Could the ducts be for combustion air?
Not when it effects the return air ducting.
The correct phrasing would be: Not when it affects the
return
air
ducting.
Of course now you'll claim that you knew that. Sure, we
believe
you,
uh-
hunh...
Oh my, the idiot police have arrived... an e for an a...
However, my statement *is* true, unlike a lot of your ****.
No your statement as written isn't true. Admit your error and
move
on.
Or
try to lie your way out of it like always.
Then, by all means, prove that it's wrong.
BTW, my posts are always based on facts. Unlike yours, which
contain
lie after lie.
Point out one lie. There isn't a single one. You had to ask why a
liquid line won't sweat and you can't provide a clear technical
explanation of
the
return duct function.
So, you want to bring in your lies from another thread, Eh?
I NEVER asked WHY a LL would sweat.
But, you made it very clear that you know nothing about mini-
splits!
Nothing I have posted in this thread is inaccurate either, so why
don't
you STFU.
Saying something "effects" the return duct is inaccurate and it
demonstrates your incompetence. Nothing you can say will change
those
simple facts. Oh, also don't tell me what to do dumbass.
My post was dead on accurate.
Nothing you can do or say will change that fact!
Looks like you can't even handle the English language much
less
a
technical
subject. Sorry 'bout that. Maybe you should just focus trying
to
display
some competence? Of course that is probably beyond your
capabilities...
No problems here, sorry you can't handle the heat and have to
make
up
****.
It's real simple. Go to a dictionary. Look-up "effect" and
"affect."
Note the difference. Nothing made up at all. Sorry that you can't
admit
your errors and move on.
Just like your butt buddy with the "you" for "your"...
But, since that's all you got, run with it, right?
No, that's not correct. You were attempting to communicate and
failed
miserably. So sorry but that's just the way it is.
I know the way it is, you're a complete moron.
Try all you want, nothing will change this fact either.
My statements are facts, I'm sorry that you're incompetent and
can't
keep up in a technical discussion.
Let's see here now. You don't know why a liquid line won't sweat and
you
can't tell the difference between an "effect" and an "affect." Ok.
Now
you
want to say I'm incompetent. Wow. You have a serious reality
disconnect
there bud. Get help now!
Ok Dip****, it was a technical discussion on mini-splits, that you
know
nothing about.
But, a LL can indeed sweat, under the right conditions.
A liquid line will not sweat. If it is sweating then it isn't a liquid
line. Got it?
That's like saying if your water heater goes out, the hot supply line
isn't
the hot supply line anymore.
You're so clueless that you could start school all over again.
So, you don't have it yet. A compressor discharge line will not sweat. A
liquid line will not sweat. If it's sweating then it is something else.
Don't try to understand it, just accept it.
Sorry, I don't accept fiction for facts.
Fact is, a LL can sweat under the right circumstances.
The other fact, is that you're so far out in left field you couldn't keep up
in the technical discussion.
Must suck to be so incompetent that you have to make **** up.
You can argue all you want, you don't know the facts and will never
be
capable of understanding them.
So, please refrain from posting more of your lies on the subject.
I haven't posted a single lie. Letseeherenow, you don't know why a
liquid
line won't sweat and you refuse to acknowledge the difference between
"affect" and "effect." Just who is the story teller? Hmmmm?
I used an 'e' for an 'a'... however, that doesn't make my post
inaccurate.
Actually it does. Now if "effect" meant the same as "affect" then your
post
might be accurate. Got it?
I'm sorry you're to incompetent to understand this.
BTW, you have posted lie after lie... it just keeps growing.
Sure thing liquid line boi. Just keep dancing to my tune.
Are you ready for your treat now?