On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 16:06:07 -0700, "Rod & Betty Jo"
wrote:

As a consumer one might rightfully complain about service, employees or
even his salary but consumers kept buying and HD made more money under his
leadership. Rod

That's not what I read on cbs.marke****ch.com and in the "Wall Street
Journal":

http://www.marke****ch.com/news/story/nardelli-poised-tackle-lengthy-chrysler/story.aspx?guid=%7BF16A2E7F%2D99F9%2D4D0C%2D9B5D%2 D3470323FB5D4%7D

It was essentially the stockholders (remember them, the OWNERS?) who
fired him. If the company was so profitable, I doubt the shareholders
would have driven him out. Shareholders usually LOVE mavericks who
return results. The only results Nardelli returned were to his own
net worth.

Got any news that proves otherwise?

How about this?
http://www.marke****ch.com/news/story/evidence-bad-management-plain-sight/story.aspx?guid=%7BECCA73E0%2D6623%2D47CA%2D89B6%2 DC3DE7CA509E0%7D


---------------------------------------------
** http://www.bburke.com/woodworking.html **
---------------------------------------------