On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 05:59:21 -0500, flipper wrote:

On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:05:53 -0700, Spurious Response
wrote:

On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:36:42 -0500, flipper wrote:

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:05:20 -0700, Spurious Response
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:36:14 +0100, feebo wrote:

Isn't it time this ridiculous exercise was brought to an end? Branson
cannot credibly claim to be environmentally aware while proposing to
waste huge amounts of fossil fuel taking the rich on gratuitous trips
through the upper atmosphere and into the edge of space.
"

His rocket motors do not use fossil fuel, you retarded twit.

No, but his air launch vehicle does.


Considering the thousands of daily flights around the world, do you
really think that one more makes a difference?

I didn't make any claims one way or the other about whether it 'makes
a difference'. Just pointing out that fossil fuels are, indeed, used.

save your breath, he's not interested in facts that are inconvenient
for him.

I and many others have locked horns with him several times over the
past year during which time he has nym-shifted about 4 or 5 times in
an attempt to evade kill-lists. I am just surprised he isn't
cross-posting this to alt.world.plus.dog - by doing this he was pretty
much single-handedly responsible for the burning of SED, which seems
to be cooling a bit now - he'll no doubt breathe on the embers.