Ross Herbert wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 08:20:33 -0700, Donald
wrote:


Ross Herbert wrote:


On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 05:25:05 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
wrote:



"Ross Herbert" wrote in message
news


Donald, whoever you are - you responded to my post but there is
nothing in your reply which I actually wrote.

I simply commented that the image posted by the OP was of no help

in


being able to identify anything meaningful.

Try to be more careful in future.

What part of "Crummy quality image taken from crummy quality

webcast"

did


you fail to understand?




I don't understand what you are getting at. The OP posted a link to
http://www.uploadwiz.com/FIMGWIZ6444573741.gif which has a tiny and
very fuzzy image of some item which is totally unrecognisable given
the poor quality of the image.

I responded to the OP's post regarding the poor image quality and

then

Donald whoever he is, responded directly to my first post and

snipped

everything I had written, and posted this inane comment;

"What webcast ??

That will help to identify it."

It was Donald who was asking "what webcast??, not me. I haven't a

clue

what the last sentence he wrote refers to so why don't you ask him
and/or direct your comments to him.

Sorry,

This is the line from the OP. (Usual Suspect )

"Crummy quality image taken from crummy quality webcast. Sorry. Same
image is he
http://www.uploadwiz.com/FIMGWIZ6444573741.gif
Hoping someone can recognize the lo-rez image..."

So if the OP is still around,

What webcast ??

donald


Donald, you did it again....

Do not direct your question to the OP by responding to my posts.

Go to the OP's very first post, click on it and then reply to him with
anything new you want to say to him.

Well it doesn't matter any more.

The OP is gone, or does not what to share the "web cast"

I am sorry if I dragged you into an incorrect link.

donald

PS: I left in all the links, so I can at least apologize to the right
person.