On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:59:40 -0500, dpb wrote:

mm wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:04:10 -0700, "Dan" wrote:

It's probably doesn't make financial sense to hire an attorney, but the AG
thing is a good idea. Thanks.

The AG may be a good idea if the office has somethingb helpful to say,
but if they don't have something helpful, it doesn't mean much. They
are not your lawyer and they mostly know about illegal activities, and
not about all the arguments that will win in court.

That's not the purpose in calling them -- the point is to find out if
their office has made any declaration against a particular firm in
general in the pertinent jurisdiction. It's the kind of thing OP is
hoping for--that, or a class-action suit or some such.

I didnt' want him to perhaps overestimate what you had said.

I said that it's good to call them if they have something helpful to
say, like you mention here, but if they don't have anything, that
doesn't mean he has no alternatives.