In uk.d-i-y, Owain wrote:
Mike Barnes wrote:
In uk.d-i-y, Derek Geldard wrote:
And if the
glass is so fragile, WTF is the point of paying for it to be toughened?
It doesn't break into sharp dangerous shards.
Thus endangering the burglar. We wouldn't want that now, would we?

We wouldn't, because (a) we might get sued, (b) why add to the distress
of being burgled by blood on the carpet.

When it happened to us the blood on the glass was DNA tested and led to
the apprehension of the perp. We didn't get sued, but we did get
compensated.

--
Mike Barnes