On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 05:35:07 -0500 (EST),
(DAUBIE1) vaguely proposed a theory
.......and in reply I say!:
remove ns from my header address to reply via email

Hi,
-
NOT IN NY STATE!!
-
Try doing that self defense crap will land you in jail 95% of the time!
Maybe if you wait to get wounded, then attack---MAYBE!
-
You better damn well be able to prove lethal force was necessary!
-

My point among others; in order to prove lethal force, you need to be
dure the guy does not have a dummy gun. You also have to be a nasty,
or very angry *******, very quickly, because you are goping to go for
and aim a gun at t aguy who is already aiming a gun at you.

Another point, which I think I said before. If guns were harder to
get, then the punks would not have had guns.

Another point. I can see where the watchmaker may be an angry *******.
But he has been wounded, Many have been killed instead, gun or not.

Can we be sure that he was not being chosen simply _because_ he was a
challenge? Why would I rob a store that was famous for being
dangerous, when there are a hundred watchmakers in the town?

As the watchmaker started to discover, all that was happening was
escalation; more and more and bigger and bigger guns.

"If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns!"

"If guns are made easy to get, _every_ outlaw will have a gun! He will
want to use it first. You have to prove he was going to, or had."

************************************************** ** sorry

..........no I'm not!
remove ns from my header address to reply via email

Does Bill Gates dream of electronic sheep?