"Bob Urz" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Bob Urz" wrote in message


Arny Krueger wrote:

"Bob Urz" wrote in message



Arny Krueger wrote:


"BOB Urz" "sound"@(remove) inetnebr.com wrote in
message




When i can get no rings out of them on the sencore,
you can about guarantee some turns are shorted.


That appears to be self-contradictory.

Are you trying to saythat even though the coils pass
a shorted-turn test, you still think they are too far
gone to be worth measuring?


You DON'T understand Arny.


Right Bob I can't read your mind. You wrote a post in a
way that would only be meaningful to someone who had
experience with a specific piece of fairly esoteric
test equipment.


Well , lets see. I said i got no rings, and that about
guarantees a shorted turns. You (who obviously doesn't
know about ringers), says it appears to be
contradictory. So, you obviously thought you knew something about
ringers to make your statement "that appears to be self contradictory".


I know that this will make your day Bob, but I've never
heard of a shorted-turn tester called a ringer. I said
that the usage appeared to be contrdictory for that
reason. Therefore your claim that I thought I knew what a ringer
was is completely false.



If you did no know
what a ringer or ring test on a coil was, goggle was a
few key strokes away.


I just googled "ringer shorted turn" and nothing popped
up that was obviously relevant in the first few pages.

Ditto for "ring test".



Humm Arny, your not as smart as i thought.

Google Marco search:
terms( coil ring test)
Results 11 - 20 of about 1,190,000 for coil ring test.

Not what I said. I introduced a concept that seems foreign to you Bob - hits
that are actually relevant to the topic.

By citing all these irrelevant hits, you're showing that you can't determine
relevance of the hits received to your own topic.