In article , Malcolm
Kirkpatrick says...

MK. Someone determines which institution shall receive the taxpayers'
K-12 education subsidy. The legislature commits the funds. Yes,
taxpayers subsidize children with the K-12 subsidy. Politically the
issue between school vouchers and the NEA/AFT/AFSCME cartel is whether
students, parents, real classroom teachers, and taxpayers, who would
all benefit from school vouchers, weigh more, in your legislator's
mind, than the public sector unions.

OK then, what do you do with the kids who spend their subsidy
and then run of voucher money half way through the year?

And, how do you handle the entanglement that vouchers are going
to cause between state funding and religious schools? Who's
driving this thing now, the state or the diocese?

Jim

==================================================
please reply to:
JRR(zero) at yktvmv (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com
==================================================