On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:16:42 -0500, krw wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:46:00 -0500, krw wrote:

[snip]

Intelligent people, at least in the West, read from top to bottom.

True. but irrelevant.

Not at all. Intelligent people write for their reader. top
posting helps the reader not.

It definitely DOES help, particularly with very large amounts of
quoted material (if you think it's really easy to scroll down, you
probably forgot about the HUNDREDS of new messages in some groups, try
that "easy" scrolling when your fingers are sore from doing it
hundreds of times).

Wy don't you snip posts then?

Irrelevant. I wasn't the one doing the bottom-posting after excessive
quoting.

Why do you post infix, if top-
posting is so kewl?

More of that @#$%! argument. What I'm against is irrational BS against
ANY position. This has nothing to do with my position (which was
arrived at intelligently, not through BS).

...or are you simply looking for an argument,
as usual?


I never do what you (mistakenly) call an argument. Apparently that's
what you want. you're not getting it here.

snip useless argumentative crap

You snip meaningful stuff that doesn't fit your delusions.

Time to end this subthread.
--
Mark Lloyd
http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com

"Properly read, the Bible is the most potent
force for atheism ever conceived." -- Isaac Asimov