In article , Gunner says...

On 29 Jan 2004 11:30:35 -0800, jim rozen
wrote:

In article , Gunner says...

Most gun threads are against those whom wish to remove that option.

It's a *discussion*. Discussions don't have a target. They
not "against anyone." That's a very republican approach to live,
everthing's a contest - winners, losers, etc.

Jim

Gosh Jim, thats a very Taoist thing to say.

There is apparently no right or wrong, no winners or losers.
Interesting.

Am I correct in interpreting your statements?

Gunner


"This device is provided without warranty of any kind as to reliability,
accuracy, existence or otherwise or fitness for any particular purpose
and Bioalchemic Products specifically does not warrant, guarantee,
imply or make any representations as to its merchantability for any
particular purpose and furthermore shall have no liability for or
responsibility to you or any other person, entity or deity with respect
to any loss or damage whatsoever caused by this device or object or by
any attempts to destroy it by hammering it against a wall or dropping it
into a deep well or any other means whatsoever and moreover asserts
that you indicate your acceptance of this agreement or any other
agreement that may he substituted at any time by coming within
five miles of the product or observing it through large telescopes or
by any other means because you are such an easily cowed moron
who will happily accept arrogant and unilateral conditions on a piece
of highly priced garbage that you would not dream of accepting on a
bag of dog biscuits and is used solely at your own risk.'

==================================================
please reply to:
JRR(zero) at yktvmv (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com
==================================================