On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 15:52:30 GMT, Larry Jaques
wrote:

On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 07:57:43 GMT, Gunner
brought forth from the murky depths:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:32:11 GMT, Larry Jaques
wrote:

Both are probably true and both results are worth flushing.
Vote independent! Shun DEMs and REPs, two of the most corrupt
political parties in the world!

Given the current crop of Independent Candidates....Id just as soon
vote for either a Dem or a Repub, for the most part.
Most..not all..but most Indys are nutjobs of the first water.
At least with a Dem or Repub, you know generally what you are getting
and dont have to worry about your candidate being committed.
Indicted yes... G

Don't you see the darker ramifications of that voting pattern?

Absolutely true! However..one has to be a pragmatist and understand
that the sheeple will continue to vote along party lines for the most
part, with rare exceptions..and a vote for a indy..is simply a wasted
vote. I learned that with Perot..and it got us Clinton.

--As long as you vote for those f*ckheads, they will continue to
behave just as they do now; _none_ of it in our best interest.--

Vote for change now, perfection later. Until we break up the
corrupt 2-party monopoly, they've got us by the soft parts.



Re CA: Though I would have voted for Ms. Carey, Ahnold might be
the best thing CA has had going for it in a decade. G'luck down
there, eh?

We are having a ball watching the shenanigans in Sacramento

Gunner


================================================= =========
Save the + http://www.diversify.com
Endangered SKEETS! + Web Application Programming
================================================= =========

'If you own a gun and have a swimming pool in the yard, the swimming
pool is almost 100 times more likely to kill a child than the gun is.'"
Steven Levitt, UOC prof.