This is what they are going to do and below you can read what happened.

November 4, 2003 - The ATFE and its contractor, Applied Research
Associates, have been purchasing high power rocket motors, rocket
kits, launch rails, electrical launchers and other items to conduct
tests at Hill Air Force Base in Utah. The purpose of the tests is to
provide proof that high power rockets can be used to shoot down
commercial aircraft during landings and takeoffs. The tests will be
documented by videotape. It is expected that the video tape will be
released during a press conference for maximum media exposure.

The ATFE plans were first discovered by a high power rocket vendor who
recognized the name of ATFE agent, David Shatzer, as he purchased
launch rail equipment. Mr. Shatzer has been traveling across the
country purchasing other high power rocket supplies using the cover
story that he is a high power rocket hobbyist. He changes the story
with respect to who he will be flying with depending on his
geographical location. Applied Research Associates has purchased at
least 40 J350 rocket motors and large numbers of rocket kits from
different suppliers.

It was reported to ARSA that Applied Research Associates employees
along with ATFE agents were to conduct tests yesterday at Hill Air
Force Base using a target drone to simulate a commercial aircraft. The
high power rockets were to be launched out of a parked van. The
rockets were going to be launched one at a time at the drone as well
as several at a time. The rockets did not contain explosive warheads.
It is not known whether the drone was rigged to simulate an explosion
as a high power rocket passed by.

This is what happened :-)
Dave

More interesting news about our buddies at the BATFE.

There is a rumor floating around about ATF "blowing up" a truck during
the
Utah tests. Most of what is being said is inaccurate. Here is what we
know.

ATF, through the USAF, hired an independent contractor to conduct some
tests.
ATF purchased a number of J350, G80s and other motors for these tests.
They
also purchased some kits from at least 2 manufacturers. The tests, being
conducted here in Utah (off I80, north of mile marker 60) have been
taking
place most of November through last week.

Supposedly, they affixed a launcher in the back of a van and were
launching
from the van. As to why, we can only speculate. They also had numerous
reloads
in the same van while launching. One of the J350s catoed and ignited the
rest,
burning the van to the ground. (It did not blow up, it just burned up.)
So
much for hired experts who supposedly should know better.

This, of course, begs a question: If APCP is explosive as they claim,
why
would they be ingniting motors near other motors - with people sitting
in
the
van? Would they have conducted tests in this manner if the materials
being
tested were TNT based? Hmmmm...


The methodology of the left has always been:

1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie