On 8 Dec 2003 08:59:37 -0800, (Carl
Nisarel) wrote:

"JTMcC" wrote
"Carl Nisarel" wrote
"JTMcC" wrote ....

Why do you gunners keep using that irrelevant and idiotic appeal to
emotion fallacy?

You're just demonstrating that you are not intelligent enough to
figure out how to deal with life without a gun.

Your moronic, and unoriginal, retort does not have anything to do with
Lott's invalidated research.

OK, I guess you don't have a lovely wife then.

When did you stop beating your wife?

Of course you are trying to stigmatize anyone that supports the 2nd
Amendment as a wife beater

No, I'm not. It's the classic example of the complex question fallacy.
It seems you aren't bright enough or educated enough to recognize it.

But thanks for demonstrating that you're just another gunner who's
mindset is still back in the 1950s.

Once again, Churl demonstrates that denial is not a river in Egypt and
whom will say anything to try to advance his agenda. A lacky for
HCI..shrug, what more can be said?

Gunner

No 220-pound thug can threaten the well-being or dignity of a 110-pound
woman who has two pounds of iron to even things out. Is that evil?
Is that wrong? People who object to weapons aren't abolishing violence,
they're begging for the rule of brute force, when the biggest, strongest
animals among men were always automatically "right". Guns end that,
and social democracy is a hollow farce without an armed populace to make
it work.
- L. Neil Smith