On Mon, 8 May 2006 21:53:01 +0100, Doctor Drivel wrote
(in article ews.net):


"Andy Hall" aka Matt wrote in message
...
On 2006-05-08 18:48:33 +0100, "Doctor Drivel" said:


"Andy Hall" aka Matt wrote in message
...
On 2006-05-08 16:16:01 +0100, "Doctor Drivel" said:


"Andy Hall" aka Matt wrote in message
...
On 2006-05-08 12:59:22 +0100, "Doctor Drivel"
said:


"John Rumm" wrote in message
...

He hasn't. He just had a shag.

On employers time, in their offices,

Not proven. He had a shag and that is his busines and his alone. How
is Little Middle England today?

I guess that his wife might have a different view...

His personal family view not yours or mine. A non-story.

I know that he and you would

Snip Little Middle England Tripe

If Johnny wants a shag with a consenting shagger, that is his business; a
non-story.

Why are you defending him?

Because it is none of our business at all. All he has done no wrong except
have a shag with a consenting shagger. That is nothing to attack. A
non-story. No worth talking about. It is like talking about Johnny tying up
his shoe laces.


If it weren't in a workplace and in employer's time it would be less of an
issue. It would also be less of an issue if he hadn't taken a position of
moral high ground when politicians of other parties did similar things.

Unfortunately neither is true and his position is indefensible. He now has
no department and no serious responsibility. In essence, he is nothing more
than a burden on the taxpayer.

:andy