On 21 Mar 2006 04:05:23 -0800, wrote:


Gunner wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:37:49 +0000 (UTC), "Northern Raider"
wrote:


"Cliff" wrote in message
news On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:07:42 GMT, Gunner wrote:

Bikini and other test sites were uninhabited.

Not really.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/d...00/2781419.stm
http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/world/A0807551.html
--
Gunner proven wrong again, now there is a
suprise.......................................... ...................

You evidently missed this part:

Bikini , atoll, c.2 sq mi (5.2 sq km), W central Pacific, one of the
Ralik Chain, Marshall Islands. It comprises 36 islets on a reef 25 mi
(40 km) long. After its inhabitants were removed (1946) to Rongerik,
Bikini was the scene of 23 U.S. atomic and hydrogen bomb tests
(1946-58). The natives were transferred from Rongerik to Ujelang in
1947 and in 1949 were resettled on Kili.

Now if they were moved far away in 1946....it would appear to be
uninhabited. Is this a true statement?

Gunner

I see the method. They state a lie and a link, and make the assumption
that no one will read their reference.

"were uninhabited" "inhabitants were removed"

HTH With your reading comprehension disability.
--
Cliff