On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 09:40:04 -0000, "Mary Fisher"
wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:18:46 -0000, "Mary Fisher"
wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message
...

Serves you right for switching and not keeping a stable record!

These were each over a period of a couple of years, so there was a
pattern.

I meant your record with the suppliers:-)

Oh well...... I don't really care about that. They seem to be
avaricious for my business. :-)

But your wanting to penalise the supplier to save paying abit of interest
means that other consumers are subsidising you.


That becomes a circular argument, though. I could argue that if
everybody handled the supplier in this way, that this would not
happen. It might cause the supplier to address the issue and
operate in a more honest way rather than expecting customers to
subsidise his cash flow.


--

..andy


Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com