DIYbanter - View Single Post

wrote:
Steve Spence wrote:
wrote:

Yes, 1/3 of the traditional top loader of equivalent size.
Dont think ours have used that much since the 1960s, they've come a
long way.

Define "that much".

what it says above! JC. Shall I requote for you?

1/3 of the traditional top loader of equivalent size.

These are both under 5 years old. The front loader
uses 1/3rd the water and electric that the top loader does.

why are you repeating yourself anyway? Whats that going to achieve?

because your response did not fit the thread. Trying to get you to
clarify so we can make sense of it.

--
Steve Spence
Dir., Green Trust, http://www.green-trust.org
Contributing Editor, http://www.off-grid.net
http://www.rebelwolf.com/essn.html